Thursday, June 7, 2012

ITES Activity 3 by Karen Lloyd

Please scroll to the bottom for notes......




Analyze other Common Core / Essential Standards for places to connect with the ITES. What commonalities do you notice?
How do they compare?

"Take notes" in the form of a blog on all the connections that you find.
Copy the link to your blog entry, and paste it to share with others.



Writing Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6–12


1. Write arguments focused on discipline-specific

a. Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s),
establish the significance of the claim(s),
distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or
opposing claims, and create an organization
that logically sequences the claim(s),
counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and
thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data
and evidence for each while pointing out the
strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and
counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form
that anticipates the audience’s knowledge
level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
c. Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as
varied syntax to link the major sections of
the text, create cohesion, and clarify the
relationships between claim(s) and reasons,
between reasons and evidence, and between
claim(s) and counterclaims.
d. Establish and maintain a formal style and
objective tone while attending to the norms
and conventions of the discipline in which they
are writing.
e. Provide a concluding statement or section
that follows from or supports the argument
presented
2. Write informative/explanatory texts, including
the narration of historical events, scientific
procedures/ experiments, or technical processes.
a. Introduce a topic and organize complex ideas,
concepts, and information so that each new
element builds on that which precedes it to
create a unified whole; include formatting
(e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures,
tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding
comprehension.
b. Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the
most significant and relevant facts, extended
definitions, concrete details, quotations, or
other information and examples appropriate to
the audience’s knowledge of the topic.
c. Use varied transitions and sentence structures
to link the major sections of the text, create
cohesion, and clarify the relationships among
complex ideas and concepts.
d. Use precise language, domain-specific
vocabulary and techniques such as metaphor,
simile, and analogy to manage the complexity
of the topic; convey a knowledgeable stance
in a style that responds to the discipline and
context as well as to the expertise of likely
readers.
e. Provide a concluding statement or section
that follows from and supports the information
or explanation provided (e.g., articulating
implications or the significance of the topic).
Produce clear and coherent writing in which
the development, organization, and style are
appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
Develop and strengthen writing as needed by
planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying
a new approach, focusing on addressing what
is most significant for a specific purpose and
audience
Use technology, including the Internet, to produce,
publish, and update individual or shared writing
products in response to ongoing feedback,
including new arguments or information.
Conduct short as well as more sustained research
projects to answer a question (including a selfgenerated
question) or solve a problem; narrow or
broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize
multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating
understanding of the subject under investigation.
Gather relevant information from multiple
authoritative print and digital sources, using
advanced searches effectively; assess the
strengths and limitations of each source in terms
of the specific task, purpose, and audience;
integrate information into the text selectively to
maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and
overreliance on any one source and following a
standard format for citation
Draw evidence from informational texts to support
analysis, reflection, and research.
Write routinely over extended time frames (time
for reflection and revision) and shorter time
frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a
range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and
audiences.



Commonalities/ Comparsions

1. The Common Core discipline is specific versus the ITES are generalized.
2. They use different language but the skills and the results wanted are almost identical.
3. Common Core emphasizes the writing more than ITES.
4. Both look at source appropriateness and reliability.
5. Both use technology to support teaching.
6. Both have a resource process. Both emphasis appropriate questions.
7. Both have a "lawful" component.




2 comments:

  1. I especially like comment #2 from above. It emphasizes that the approach can vary, fostering creativity and diverse learning styles, therefore the results will also be varied and creative.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Karen,
    Very thorough in your comments and comparisons. I am glad you chose the writing standards because I chose the social studies standards and thought I might have gotten confused on the assignment when so many compared to the ITES.

    ReplyDelete